Evidence Contrary to the Existing Exo-Planet Migration Concept

Exo-planet migration is assumed to have occurred to explain close-to-star gas giant exoplanets within the context of the so-called standard model of solar system formation, rather than giving cause to question the validity of that particular model. I present evidence against the concept of planet migration, evidence that is historical, interdisciplinary, and model-independent. First, I demonstrate a flaw in the standard model of solar system formation that would lead to the contradiction of terrestrial planets having insufficiently massive cores. Then, I discuss the evidence that points to the Earth previously having been a Jupiter-like close-to-Sun gas giant and the consequences that arise there from. Observations of close-to-star gas giant exo-planets orbiting stars other than our own Sun, rather than being evidence for planet migration, I submit, are evidence for differing degrees of violence associated with the thermonuclear ignition of their particular stars. As observational resolution improves, one might expect to find other exoplanetary systems, like our own, with their innermost planets stripped of gaseous envelopes. Such systems may be a necessary requirement for the existence of life.